喜马拉雅要靠山，腾讯音乐要希望

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the valuation and challenges faced by Ximalaya, China's largest online audio platform, particularly in light of its acquisition by Tencent Music at a significantly reduced price, raising questions about its worth and sustainability in the competitive landscape of online audio and music [4][38]. Group 1: Valuation and Market Position - Ximalaya was sold to Tencent Music for 20.9 billion, which is one-third less than its last financing round valuation of 30 billion [4]. - Despite having a monthly active user base nearing 300 million, Ximalaya's financial struggles are evident, with over 3 billion in losses over five years and multiple failed IPO attempts [4][20]. - The valuation of Ximalaya is compared to other platforms, indicating it is worth approximately seven times Zhihu, eight times Keep, and eleven times Douyu [4]. Group 2: Importance of Copyright - Copyright is identified as the most valuable asset for online audio platforms, with Ximalaya's strategic partnerships and acquisitions in this area being crucial for its market position [5][11]. - Ximalaya has established significant copyright agreements, holding 70% of the market for audiobooks and exclusive content partnerships since 2014 [8][9]. - The platform's revenue structure heavily relies on subscription income, which constitutes over half of its total revenue, primarily driven by its extensive copyright library [10]. Group 3: Financial Performance and Challenges - Ximalaya's subscription revenue growth has drastically slowed from 57.1% in 2021 to 8.5% in 2023, indicating a decline in user willingness to pay [24]. - The average monthly active users include a significant number from third-party platforms, which may not contribute to revenue, highlighting the limitations of monetization in the audio sector [22]. - The platform's operational costs are heavily influenced by revenue sharing and content costs, which together account for over 30% of its income [20]. Group 4: Industry Comparisons - In contrast to Ximalaya, Tencent Music has a more robust subscription model with a higher payment rate, indicating a more mature commercial structure in the online music sector [32][36]. - The online audio market lacks the broad audience and established commercial mechanisms that the online music industry possesses, making it difficult for platforms like Ximalaya to achieve similar financial success [37]. - The article suggests that the online audio industry's ceiling for user engagement and monetization is lower than anticipated, leading to Ximalaya's ongoing financial difficulties [21][22].