关税谈判欧洲跪了，哪些资产会下跌？

Core Viewpoint - The recent trade agreement between the U.S. and the EU is perceived as unfavorable for Europe, as it involves a 15% tariff on EU products while requiring significant investments and purchases from the U.S. [2][10][15] Group 1: Agreement Details - The U.S. will impose a 15% tariff on EU products, aligning with the rate set for Japan [2] - The EU is expected to invest an additional $600 billion in the U.S. and purchase $750 billion worth of U.S. energy products [2][14] - The agreement is seen as a trade-off where Europe accepts higher tariffs in exchange for investment commitments [3][4] Group 2: European Response - EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen acknowledged that while the 15% tariff is not ideal, it is the best outcome they could achieve [5] - There are significant dissenting voices within Europe, with leaders like the French Prime Minister criticizing the agreement as detrimental to European interests [20][21] - The agreement is compared to historical unequal treaties, suggesting that Europe is sacrificing its own benefits [22][23] Group 3: Strategic Implications - The agreement reinforces Europe's energy dependence on the U.S., especially in light of recent geopolitical tensions [33][34] - The U.S. may leverage this energy dependency to impose higher prices on European imports [34][37] - The U.S. is expected to pursue similar agreements with other nations, particularly Japan, using its strategic advantages [41][43]