爱康国宾，没有退路

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the strategic decision-making of Aikang Guobin, emphasizing the necessity for the company to adopt a hardline stance in response to criticism in order to survive in a challenging environment [11][28]. Group 1: Purpose and Strategy - Aikang Guobin's primary objective is to "survive," and all strategies are designed around this goal [11]. - The company must evaluate the benefits, risks, and costs associated with its decisions, particularly in high-stakes situations [12][13]. Group 2: Risk and Consequences - If Aikang Guobin were to admit fault or apologize, it could equate to accepting liability for serious health issues, which could lead to significant financial repercussions [25][26]. - The company faces a scenario where not responding could result in unlimited costs and risks, making a strong rebuttal the only viable option [28][22]. Group 3: Industry Context - The situation is so severe that competitors are hesitant to comment, indicating a broader industry concern about the implications of the standards being set [29][30]. - The article highlights that the lack of a response could lead to dire consequences for Aikang Guobin, reinforcing the idea that there is no alternative but to maintain a firm position [32][33].