综合价值管理赋能上市公司形成四大合力

Core Viewpoint - The core viewpoint emphasizes that listed companies are not solely the assets of major shareholders but are jointly owned by diverse investors, necessitating a comprehensive value management approach to align the differing expectations and evaluations of various investor types [1][6][7]. Group 1: Importance of Diverse Investor Participation - The trend of socialized ownership in A-share companies is evident, with the proportion of institutional and government holdings decreasing from 50.7% in 2018 to 42.0% in 2024, while individual and professional investors' share is increasing [7]. - The participation of diverse investors is crucial for the development of listed companies, especially in sectors like biotechnology and information technology, where early-stage financial and industrial investments are vital for overcoming innovation challenges [8]. Group 2: Comprehensive Value Management - Comprehensive value management aims to transform the divergences among diverse investors into a collaborative force for high-quality development, focusing on balancing financial stability, technological innovation, and social responsibility [6][10]. - Companies must respect the value preferences of various investors and integrate their investment needs and returns through comprehensive value management [11][12]. Group 3: Addressing Discrepancies Among Investors - Discrepancies between financial investors and major shareholders pose challenges for value management, as financial investors prioritize short-term performance while major shareholders focus on long-term growth [13][14]. - Companies should optimize shareholder balance mechanisms to guide collaboration between large and small shareholders, ensuring that both short-term and long-term interests are addressed [15][16]. Group 4: Innovation and Technology Development - Discrepancies between industrial investors and company management regarding technology innovation can hinder progress, necessitating a collaborative approach to align interests and drive innovation [17][18]. - Companies should establish inclusive decision-making processes that involve management, technical teams, and industrial investors to foster a shared understanding of technology paths and innovation outcomes [19]. Group 5: Risk Sharing Mechanisms - Financial and industrial investors often have differing risk preferences, complicating the establishment of effective risk-sharing mechanisms in innovation [20][21]. - Companies should adopt diversified financing strategies to distribute risks among various investor groups, enhancing stability and flexibility in funding [22][23]. Group 6: Balancing Economic and Social Values - Social investors emphasize long-term societal impacts over short-term economic gains, presenting challenges for companies in balancing these interests [24][25]. - Companies should implement comprehensive value management to achieve a balance between economic performance and social responsibility, ensuring that both short-term and long-term values are considered [26][27]. Group 7: Role of Entrepreneurs - Entrepreneurs play a crucial role in shaping the public image and social value of companies, influencing investor perceptions and market performance [27]. - Companies should leverage the positive social value of entrepreneurs while being mindful of the potential negative impacts of their actions on corporate reputation [27].