【基金擂台赛】震荡市下固收+基金的攻守之道：华泰保兴尊合债券 VS 光大保德信增利收益债券

Core Viewpoint - In the current low-interest and volatile market environment, fixed income plus (固收+) products are favored by investors for their balance of yield and stability. These products typically allocate at least 80% of assets to bond-related assets for stable returns, while the "+" portion allows for flexible investments in convertible bonds, stocks, IPOs, and commodities to enhance returns while controlling volatility and drawdown [1]. Group 1: Fund Overview - The article introduces two actively managed bond funds primarily investing in pure bonds and convertible bonds, highlighting their differing risk-return characteristics due to variations in portfolio strategies [1]. - Huatai Baoxing Zunhe Bond Fund has been managed by Zhang Ting since November 2017, while Everbright Baodexin Zengli Yield Bond Fund has been managed by Huang Bo since October 2019. Both managers have similar backgrounds in managing insurance and pension products, focusing initially on pure bonds and convertible bonds before expanding to multi-asset management [3][4]. Group 2: Investment Process - Huatai Baoxing Zunhe Bond Fund aims for absolute returns with low volatility, while Everbright Baodexin Zengli Yield Bond Fund targets relative returns, striving to exceed the benchmark yield of the China All Bond Index annually [7]. - Both funds utilize a top-down approach for pure bond allocation, assessing macroeconomic trends and adjusting the allocation of bond types based on liquidity and credit spread changes. Huatai Baoxing typically maintains a credit bond allocation of 45%-85%, while Everbright Baodexin targets 70%-80% [8]. Group 3: Performance Comparison - Over the past year, Huatai Baoxing Zunhe Bond Fund achieved an annualized return of 4.62%, ranking in the top 8% of its category, while Everbright Baodexin Zengli Yield Bond Fund returned 4.80%, ranking in the top 7% [10]. - In the last three years, Huatai Baoxing's standard deviation was 2.07%, ranking in the top 8%, while Everbright Baodexin's was higher at 4.32%, ranking in the top 56% [10]. Group 4: Fee Structure - Both funds have comprehensive fee rates below the industry average, with Everbright Baodexin Zengli Yield Bond Fund having slightly lower fees than Huatai Baoxing Zunhe Bond Fund, primarily due to lower trading costs [11].