36氪·2025-08-07 11:08Core Viewpoint - Tesla's recent $4.3 billion battery deal with LGES indicates a strategic shift to reduce reliance on Chinese battery suppliers due to increasing tariffs and costs associated with importing lithium iron phosphate batteries from China [5][8][10]. Group 1: Tesla's Strategic Shift - Tesla's CFO noted that U.S. tariffs have increased costs by $300 million, particularly impacting energy business due to reliance on Chinese imports [10]. - The current U.S. tariff policy imposes a total of 40.9% on imported storage batteries from China, which includes various tariffs [12]. - Tesla's decision to partner with LGES is seen as a move to localize production and avoid tariff-related costs, despite the challenges of completely severing ties with Chinese suppliers [20][23]. Group 2: Market Dynamics and Supply Chain - China dominates the lithium iron phosphate battery market, accounting for 94% of global production capacity in 2024, making it difficult for Tesla to fully transition away from Chinese suppliers [14][13]. - Key materials for lithium iron phosphate batteries are still sourced from China, indicating that even with new partnerships, some dependency remains [21][17]. - The U.S. has recognized that existing trade agreements do not effectively promote domestic manufacturing, leading to increased scrutiny and potential new tariffs on allied countries [30]. Group 3: Challenges for Chinese Suppliers - Chinese suppliers face significant barriers to entering the U.S. market, including regulatory hurdles and the need for local partnerships to navigate tariffs [36][34]. - The Inflation Reduction Act categorizes Chinese suppliers as "foreign entities of concern," complicating their ability to receive subsidies and participate in the U.S. market [36]. - Despite the challenges, some Chinese companies are attempting to establish manufacturing facilities in the U.S. to mitigate tariff impacts, but face numerous obstacles [34][37].