Workflow
从巴菲特投资美国运通,看腾讯和茅台
雪球·2025-08-08 08:18

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the concept of "turnaround" in investment, using the historical example of American Express and comparing it to current situations faced by companies like Tencent and Moutai, emphasizing the importance of a company's competitive moat despite market fears [4][8]. Group 1: American Express Case Study - In 1964, Warren Buffett invested approximately $13 million to acquire 5% of American Express shares at an average price of $71 per share, which later rose to $180 per share, showcasing a significant turnaround [4]. - The "Salad Oil Scandal" in 1963 led to a crisis for American Express, causing its stock price to plummet due to fears of insolvency after banks sought compensation for losses exceeding $150 million [6]. - Buffett's unique insight allowed him to recognize that American Express's core business remained strong, as customers continued to use its services despite the scandal, leading him to invest heavily in the company [7]. Group 2: Comparison with Tencent - The article draws parallels between American Express's situation and Tencent's challenges from 2021 to 2022, where negative market sentiment led to a significant drop in its price-to-earnings (PE) ratio to 9 times, with the stock price falling to levels not seen in five years [8]. - Despite the adverse conditions, Tencent's core applications, such as WeChat and gaming, continued to thrive, indicating that the company's competitive advantages remained intact [8]. - The recovery of Tencent's stock price in subsequent years illustrates the potential for turnaround when a company's fundamental strengths are not eroded [8]. Group 3: Current Market Observations - Companies like Moutai and Wuliangye are highlighted as having similar characteristics to American Express and Tencent, where despite concerns over oversupply and inventory issues, they remain preferred choices for high-end dining and gifting [9]. - The enduring demand for premium liquor in social settings reinforces the idea that these companies possess a strong competitive moat, similar to the historical examples discussed [9].