基金终于回本了！继续拿着会不会再次被套牢？一文告诉你，千万别再犯同样的错误！

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of understanding the role of funds in an investment portfolio and aligning them with individual investment goals and timelines, especially after the recent recovery of the stock market [5][6]. Group 1: Key Questions for Fund Assessment - Investors often focus on "what to buy" rather than "how long to hold" and "how much to buy," which are crucial for investment outcomes [10]. - The article suggests that understanding the fund's role in a portfolio can help avoid unsuitable investments [10]. Group 2: Holding Period for Funds - The article discusses the significance of knowing a fund's "worst-case scenario," focusing on maximum drawdown and the duration of that drawdown [12][13]. - Historical data shows that high-equity funds can have maximum drawdown durations of 7 to 10 years, indicating the need for long-term investment strategies [17][20]. - Funds can be categorized based on holding periods: short-term (1-2 years), mid-term (2-6 years), mid-long term (6-10 years), and long-term (>10 years) [21]. Group 3: Fund Allocation in Portfolios - The article outlines two dimensions for determining "how much" to invest: diversification and complexity of the fund's strategy [25]. - Funds can be classified into three roles in a portfolio: core holdings (40-80%), secondary holdings (15-40%), and satellite holdings (0-15%) [26][27]. - Core holdings should be diversified and balanced, while satellite holdings should be limited due to their complexity and risk [27]. Group 4: Role of Chinese Funds in Portfolios - The article presents a framework for understanding the positioning of different types of Chinese funds based on their holding periods and risk levels [30]. - Many funds are not suitable for short-term needs, indicating that they are better suited for long-term investment strategies [31]. - A significant number of funds are only appropriate for small allocations in long-term portfolios, explaining the challenges investors face when relying solely on past performance [31].