Workflow
扎克伯格,也顶不住了

Core Viewpoint - Meta has shifted its strategy in the AI talent acquisition race, initially aggressively hiring top talent but has recently paused recruitment to reassess its organizational structure and budget allocation [6][20][24] Group 1: Recruitment Strategy - Meta's approach to AI talent acquisition has been characterized by rapid and high-cost hiring, with some AI researchers receiving compensation packages worth up to $300 million over four years, and top candidates reportedly being offered as much as $1.5 billion [10][11] - The company has employed a "reverse acquihire" strategy, targeting key personnel from competitors rather than acquiring entire startups, exemplified by a $14 billion minority stake investment to bring in Alexandr Wang as Chief AI Officer [11][12] - By mid-2025, Meta had successfully recruited at least 50 AI talents from competitors, with 40% coming from OpenAI and 20% from Google [12][13] Group 2: Internal Challenges - The influx of new talent has raised concerns about internal conflicts, as existing employees may feel marginalized or threatened by the new hires, leading to potential morale issues and departures [7][17] - Meta's AI division has undergone multiple reorganizations, culminating in the establishment of the "Meta Superintelligence Labs," which consolidates various AI teams into four departments [17][18] Group 3: Market Reactions and Financial Implications - Wall Street analysts have expressed concerns over the escalating costs associated with AI talent acquisition, questioning whether the investments will yield measurable returns or simply dilute shareholder value [20][22] - Meta's capital expenditure guidance for 2025 has been raised to a maximum of $72 billion, primarily directed towards AI infrastructure and talent, which has led to increased scrutiny from investors [23] - The recent decision to freeze AI recruitment is seen as a signal to the market to control costs amidst rising expenditures and investor skepticism [20][24]