热搜爆了，“越理越亏，越亏越理？” 江苏国泰138亿理财炒股计划炸锅

Core Viewpoint - Jiangsu Guotai's recent announcements regarding significant financial maneuvers, including plans to invest up to 138.3 billion yuan in financial products and securities, have raised concerns among investors about the company's strategic direction and financial management [1][3][9]. Group 1: Financial Maneuvers - Jiangsu Guotai plans to use up to 120 billion yuan of idle funds for entrusted wealth management and up to 18.31 billion yuan for securities investment, totaling 138.3 billion yuan, which exceeds the company's market capitalization of 124 billion yuan [1][6][9]. - The company has a history of significant financial investments, having previously announced similar plans in 2022 and 2023, indicating a pattern of aggressive financial strategies [12][14][15]. - Despite these investments, Jiangsu Guotai has reported cumulative losses exceeding 70 million yuan from its securities investments, underperforming compared to the market index [4][16][32]. Group 2: Operational Performance - The company's operating cash flow has been declining, with net cash flow from operating activities dropping from 36.57 billion yuan in 2022 to 16.87 billion yuan in 2024, indicating a concerning trend [23]. - Although the company reported a revenue increase of 5.46% and a net profit increase of 10.85% in the first half of the year, these figures still reflect a significant gap compared to previous years [20]. - Research and development expenditures have been consistently reduced, with a notable decline from 1.27 billion yuan in 2022 to 360 million yuan in the first half of 2025, raising questions about the company's commitment to innovation [26][32]. Group 3: Management and Governance - Jiangsu Guotai's management has been criticized for high executive compensation, with the assistant president earning 7.75 million yuan annually, while the company simultaneously reduces R&D spending [19][30]. - The disparity between high management salaries and declining investment in core business areas has led to skepticism regarding the company's governance and strategic priorities [5][32].