美联储理事库克将起诉特朗普的免职决定，特朗普：降息主张将成美联储多数派

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal battle arising from President Trump's attempt to dismiss Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, highlighting the implications for the independence of the Federal Reserve and potential impacts on monetary policy [1][14]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Lisa Cook's attorney announced plans to sue President Trump, claiming he lacks the authority to dismiss her without just cause, as defined by the Federal Reserve Act [1][2]. - If Cook files the lawsuit, it may ultimately be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, as the Federal Reserve Act stipulates that a president can only remove a board member for "just cause" [2]. - Cook can seek an injunction to restore her position while the lawsuit is ongoing [3]. Group 2: Allegations and Responses - The dismissal was based on allegations of Cook making false statements in mortgage applications, which were cited by Trump in his notification of her removal [5][6]. - Cook responded to the allegations, asserting that there is no legal basis for her dismissal and that she intends to continue her duties [6]. Group 3: Implications for the Federal Reserve - This incident marks the first time a U.S. president has attempted to dismiss a Federal Reserve governor, raising concerns about the independence of the Federal Reserve [7][14]. - Trump's actions are seen as an escalation in his efforts to exert control over the Federal Reserve, potentially affecting monetary policy decisions [14][15]. - If Trump successfully removes Cook, he would gain a majority on the seven-member Federal Reserve Board, which could lead to a shift in policy direction towards lower interest rates [15]. Group 4: Broader Context - The article notes that Cook is not the only official facing scrutiny over mortgage issues, indicating a broader trend of investigations into financial conduct among public officials [17].