特朗普试图解雇莉萨·库克，在华尔街看来或为利好

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal battle surrounding President Trump's attempt to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, highlighting the implications for the independence of the Federal Reserve and the potential impact on financing costs, with some investors expressing optimism about lower rates despite concerns over institutional integrity [2][3]. Group 1: Market Reactions and Economic Implications - The market reacted calmly to Trump's actions, with the S&P 500 and Dow Jones remaining stable, while the Nasdaq saw a slight increase of 0.3%. Long-term Treasury yields rose, and short-term yields fell, indicating investor expectations of potential rate cuts in the short term [3]. - Jay Hatfield, CEO of Infrastructure Capital Advisors, believes that the current monetary policy is overly tight, with rates 150 basis points above neutral levels, suggesting that the Fed's policies are excessively suppressing economic growth [3][5]. - Hatfield anticipates at least two rate cuts this year, aligning with dovish signals from Fed Chair Jerome Powell, and views the potential for a Republican-dominated Fed Board as a catalyst for rate reductions [7][8]. Group 2: Concerns Over Federal Reserve Independence - Other economists express skepticism about the implications of Trump's actions, warning that his attempts to control the Fed could undermine democratic foundations and institutional integrity [9]. - Analysts from Piper Sandler caution that the market's belief in its ability to constrain Trump is misguided, highlighting past failures to predict economic crises and inflation shocks [10]. - The article notes that the structure of the Fed could be fundamentally altered with more Trump nominees, potentially reshaping the Federal Open Market Committee's power dynamics [10]. Group 3: Short-term Focus and Future Expectations - UBS Global Wealth Management strategists expect the Fed to cut rates by a total of 100 basis points over the next four meetings, while acknowledging increasing political pressure on the Fed [11][12]. - Hatfield argues that the real issue lies in the Fed's long-standing ineffectiveness rather than Trump's confrontation, suggesting that any changes to the current situation would be beneficial for the market [12].