特朗普：将请求最高法院“快速裁决”全球关税案，若胜诉股市会大涨，否则巨震

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of former President Trump's appeal to the Supreme Court regarding the recent ruling that deemed most of his global tariffs illegal, highlighting the potential economic consequences and market reactions associated with this legal battle [1][3][4]. Group 1: Trump's Position and Market Impact - Trump plans to appeal to the Supreme Court, asserting that a loss could lead to unprecedented economic turmoil, while a victory could cause the stock market to soar [4][6]. - The uncertainty surrounding the appeal has contributed to a decline in the stock market, with the S&P 500 dropping approximately 1% and the Dow Jones falling over 380 points [4][7]. - Trump claims that the stock market's downturn is a direct result of the recent court ruling, emphasizing that the market desires the tariffs [7]. Group 2: Legal Context and Implications - The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that Trump's tariffs were largely illegal, stating that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not grant the president the authority to impose such tariffs [7][14]. - The ruling allows the tariffs to remain in effect until October 14, giving the Trump administration time to appeal to the Supreme Court [7][14]. - Legal experts suggest that if the Supreme Court upholds the lower court's ruling, it could significantly weaken Trump's ability to impose tariffs and disrupt his economic strategy [14][15]. Group 3: Alternative Strategies and Government Response - Treasury Secretary Bentsen expresses confidence in the Supreme Court's support for Trump's use of IEEPA but is also preparing alternative legal strategies [10][12]. - Bentsen compares the current trade deficit situation to the 2008-2009 financial crisis, emphasizing the urgency of addressing trade imbalances and the fentanyl crisis [11][12]. - If the Supreme Court rules against Trump, the government may resort to other legal tools, such as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, which allows for significant tariffs against countries deemed discriminatory to U.S. businesses [12][14].