GPT-5：前端开发者的“选择自己的冒险路线”

Core Insights - OpenAI's GPT-5 shows impressive performance in front-end web development, outperforming its predecessor in 70% of internal tests [5][6] - User experiences with GPT-5 are mixed, with some developers expressing disappointment compared to earlier expectations [6][7] - A significant portion of users rated GPT-5 as average or poor in a poll, indicating that OpenAI's promotional claims may be overly optimistic [7][8] Group 1: Performance and Reception - GPT-5 is supported by Vercel, which claims it to be the best front-end AI model [6] - Influential developers have had varying opinions, with some initially praising GPT-5 but later expressing dissatisfaction with its performance [6][7] - A GitHub Copilot user reported that GPT-5's summarization and explanation capabilities were lacking, favoring competitors like Claude Sonnet 4 [6] Group 2: Development Capabilities - Developers are exploring the potential of GPT-5 to create applications without relying on frameworks like React, using only HTML, CSS, and JavaScript [13] - GPT-5's ability to generate complete technical stacks and working prototypes has been highlighted by users [11][13] - The emergence of AI tools like GPT-5 raises questions about the necessity of traditional frameworks in front-end development [13] Group 3: User Experience and Variability - User experiences with GPT-5 vary significantly, with some using less powerful versions leading to disappointing results [14][15] - Different models of GPT-5 exhibit distinct coding styles, which may affect user satisfaction and performance [15][16] - The ongoing evaluation of GPT-5's coding personality is crucial for developers to understand its capabilities and limitations [17]