Workflow
太二酸菜鱼也预制?母公司九毛九市值蒸发500亿

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding the restaurant chain Tai Er Suancaiyu, which has faced allegations of using pre-prepared ingredients instead of fresh fish, despite marketing itself as serving "live fish" dishes. This has led to a decline in customer trust and a significant drop in the company's stock price and number of operating locations [3][15][19]. Summary by Sections Company Performance - Tai Er Suancaiyu's parent company, Jiumaojiu, reported a decrease in the number of restaurants from 614 to 566 within a year, losing 48 locations [16]. - The company's revenue for the first half of the year was 2.753 billion yuan, a year-on-year decline of 10.14%, with net profit dropping by 16.05% to 60.69 million yuan [19]. - The revenue from Tai Er Suancaiyu specifically was 1.948 billion yuan, down 13.3% compared to the previous year [19]. Customer Experience and Controversy - Reports indicated that only 12% of Tai Er Suancaiyu's 566 locations serve live fish, with most dishes prepared from centrally sourced pre-prepared ingredients [5][11]. - Customers have expressed dissatisfaction with the speed of service, with dishes being served in as little as 6 to 7 minutes, raising doubts about the authenticity of the "live fish" claim [8][10]. - The restaurant's previous reputation as a "queue king" has diminished, with customer feedback highlighting issues such as high prices and small portion sizes [19]. Market Reaction - The stock price of Jiumaojiu has plummeted by 94%, from a peak of 38.7 HKD to just 2.28 HKD, resulting in a market capitalization drop from nearly 54 billion HKD to under 3.2 billion HKD [19][22]. - The company has been removed from the Hong Kong Stock Connect list, indicating further negative market sentiment [22]. Consumer Trust and Industry Implications - The article highlights a growing consumer backlash against perceived dishonesty in the food industry, particularly regarding the use of pre-prepared ingredients marketed as fresh [23][24]. - The controversy reflects broader issues within the restaurant industry, where transparency and authenticity are increasingly demanded by consumers [24].