Workflow
研客专栏 | 9月FOMC:联储独立性压力测试的第一关
对冲研投·2025-09-18 13:09

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing tension between the Federal Reserve and political pressures from Trump, highlighting Powell's ability to maintain the Fed's independence during the recent FOMC meeting [2][5][15]. Group 1: FOMC Meeting Insights - The focus of the September FOMC meeting was not only on the rate cut magnitude but also on the dynamics within the committee, including new member Milan's rapid inclusion and legal issues faced by member Cook [3]. - Only member Milan supported a 50 basis point cut, while other members, including Waller and Bowman, aligned with the majority [3]. - The median forecast for rate cuts in 2025 was raised from 50 basis points to 75 basis points, with only 9 out of 19 members supporting this adjustment [3]. Group 2: Economic Projections - The FOMC members have become more optimistic about the economy, raising the GDP forecast for 2025 to 1.6% from 1.4% and for 2026 to 1.8% from 1.6% [4]. - The unemployment rate forecast for 2026 was lowered to 4.4% from 4.5%, while the core PCE inflation forecast was increased to 2.6% from 2.4% [4]. Group 3: Market Reactions - The independence of the Fed has led to gold being the biggest loser from the FOMC meeting, as it had previously seen a 10% increase since the Jackson Hole meeting [5]. - Other asset classes experienced limited volatility, with the market's expectations for a series of 25 basis point cuts being met [5]. Group 4: Monetary Policy and Labor Market - Powell expressed concerns about the labor market, introducing the term "risk management cut" to describe the Fed's approach to rate cuts, which may pressure the stock market [9]. - The current labor market faces challenges from reduced immigration and weakening demand, impacting the overall economic outlook [9]. Group 5: Political Pressures - Trump's significant divergence from the Fed's economic growth expectations creates ongoing political pressure, as the Fed's forecasts do not align with Trump's desire for higher growth to alleviate debt pressures [14][15].