舌战玖安，央财北交“险”胜｜南京大学、四川大学荣获第二届“中邮保险·紫荆杯” 全国高校金融普及教育辩论赛季军

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of financial education and consumer rights protection in enhancing national financial literacy, as demonstrated through the "Zijing Cup" national college financial education debate competition organized by Tsinghua University and Zhongyou Insurance [2][4][5]. Group 1: Event Overview - The financial education campaign, themed "Protecting Financial Rights and Supporting a Better Life," was jointly organized by the Financial Regulatory Bureau, the People's Bank of China, and the China Securities Regulatory Commission from September 15 to 21 [2]. - The second "Zijing Cup" national college financial education debate competition received participation from 48 universities, with four teams reaching the semifinals [2][5]. Group 2: Key Participants and Contributions - Zhang Wei, a representative from Tsinghua University, highlighted the significance of public financial knowledge and skills in protecting consumer rights and enhancing understanding of financial matters [4]. - Cao Yong, the business director of Zhongyou Insurance, noted the company's commitment to integrating financial education into its development strategy, showcasing its growth and industry standing with total assets exceeding 700 billion yuan and ranking among the top eight in the industry [5]. Group 3: Debate Topics and Insights - The first debate focused on whether to prioritize supply-side reform or demand-side cultivation to activate the 30 trillion yuan silver economy, with Nanjing University advocating for demand-side stimulation and Beijing Jiaotong University emphasizing supply-side improvements [6]. - The second debate addressed the future development of inclusive finance, debating whether to prioritize social value or commercial sustainability, with Central University of Finance and Economics supporting social value and Sichuan University advocating for commercial sustainability [8]. Group 4: Judging and Evaluation - The semifinals featured a distinguished panel of judges from academia and debate circles, reflecting the high standards and professionalism of the event [10].