Workflow
不要解雇库克!所有在世的前美联储主席、多位前财长和前白宫经济顾问致函最高法
美股IPO·2025-09-26 03:38

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining the independence of the Federal Reserve, warning that any political interference, such as the potential dismissal of Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook by President Trump, could undermine public trust in the institution and destabilize the economy [3][4][5]. Group 1: Concerns Over Federal Reserve Independence - A coalition of former Federal Reserve chairs, Treasury Secretaries, and economists has urged the Supreme Court not to allow Trump's dismissal of Cook, arguing it could jeopardize economic health and lead to higher inflation [3][6]. - The submission to the Supreme Court highlights that allowing Cook's dismissal during her legal challenge would weaken public confidence in the Federal Reserve and disrupt efforts to stabilize prices and employment [4][5]. - The document stresses that a central bank's independence is crucial for maintaining low and stable inflation without increasing unemployment, as historically, political pressures have led to economic instability [5][6]. Group 2: Historical Context and Implications - The document references former Fed Chair Arthur Burns, who faced political pressure in the 1970s, resulting in a period of high inflation and economic turmoil, illustrating the risks of undermining central bank independence [6][7]. - The legal filing underscores concerns that a non-independent central bank may prioritize short-term gains over long-term economic stability, which could have detrimental effects on the economy [7][8]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings and Arguments - Cook's legal team argues that Trump's request to dismiss her is based on unverified allegations and that the Supreme Court should reject this unconventional application, as it threatens the independence of the Federal Reserve [11][13]. - The case hinges on whether Trump has "just cause" under the Federal Reserve Act to dismiss Cook, with legal experts suggesting that the court is likely to uphold protections for Fed governors against arbitrary dismissal [12][15]. - The Supreme Court's decision could set a precedent regarding the limits of presidential power over Federal Reserve officials, impacting the institution's operational integrity [14][15].