AI吞掉网文流量，底层作者正被“无声清退”｜深氪lite

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the growing tension between human authors and AI-generated content, highlighting the challenges faced by writers in the face of AI's increasing capabilities and its impact on the literary industry [3][14]. Group 1: AI's Impact on Authors - A collective lawsuit was filed by authors against Apple for unauthorized use of their works to train AI models, indicating a significant backlash against AI in the literary community [3]. - In the domestic online literature sector, there has been a surge in AI-generated content, with a notable increase in new book releases on platforms like Tomato Novel, rising from 400 to 5606 in a year, a 13-fold increase [7]. - Authors are experiencing a decline in visibility and income due to the influx of AI content, leading to frustration and a search for alternative platforms [10][11]. Group 2: AI Content Production - AI-generated content is being produced at an unprecedented scale, with individuals and small teams using AI tools to create large volumes of literature quickly, often resulting in works that mimic popular narratives [23][24]. - The production process involves using AI to analyze successful stories and generate new content based on established templates, leading to a rapid increase in output [25][26]. - Despite the high volume of AI-generated works, there is a lack of genuine reader engagement, as many readers do not distinguish between AI and human-created content [28]. Group 3: Industry Response and Regulation - Platforms are currently siding with human authors, implementing measures to limit low-quality AI content while still allowing some AI-assisted writing [35][40]. - A backlash against AI content has led to significant protests from authors, resulting in platforms like Tomato Novel retracting controversial agreements that allowed the use of authors' works for AI training [36]. - The industry is grappling with the challenge of regulating AI content while maintaining a balance between innovation and protecting authors' rights [40][41].