“强制接管”， 西方这是明抢了？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant regulatory challenges faced by China's semiconductor leader, Wingtech Technology, particularly regarding its subsidiary Nexperia, which has been subjected to a year-long operational freeze by the Dutch government under the pretext of national security concerns [2][3][12]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - Nexperia, a key asset of Wingtech Technology, has had its operations frozen by the Dutch government starting September 30, with restrictions on assets, intellectual property, and business adjustments for one year [2][9]. - The Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs claims the action is to ensure supply chain security, citing governance issues within Nexperia as a reason for the intervention [5][6]. - The Dutch government has invoked the Goods Availability Act for the first time, asserting that the continuity and security of critical technology in the Netherlands and Europe are at risk [6][8]. Group 2: Company Response - Wingtech Technology has publicly condemned the Dutch government's actions as discriminatory and politically motivated, arguing that it violates principles of market economy and fair competition [3][12]. - The company emphasizes that the measures taken against Nexperia represent an unreasonable external takeover of a normally operating business [5][12]. - Wingtech Technology's management has expressed strong opposition to the attempts by some foreign executives to alter the company's governance structure through legal means, viewing it as a political maneuver to undermine shareholder rights [12]. Group 3: Impact on China-Europe Relations - The actions taken by the Dutch government are expected to exacerbate tensions between China and Europe in the high-tech sector, as noted by various media outlets [3][11]. - The timing of the Dutch government's decision coincides with increased pressure from the U.S. on European allies regarding technology exports to China, indicating a broader geopolitical context [15][16]. - The article highlights that the ongoing technological competition between the U.S. and China has entered a critical phase, with implications for international trade and investment [14].