企业所得税预缴申报：总分机构申报变化

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the changes in the prepayment tax declaration process for enterprises under the new guidelines issued by the State Taxation Administration, specifically focusing on the adjustments in the tax allocation calculation method for enterprises with branches across regions [2][4]. Summary by Sections Changes in Tax Allocation Calculation Method - The tax allocation calculation method for total and branch institutions has been adjusted, promoting the method used in the final settlement phase to the prepayment phase [3][4]. - Enterprises are now required to allocate the income tax payable up to the current month (or quarter) before deducting the prepayment tax from the total and branch institutions [4]. Modifications to Related Forms - The announcement includes modifications to the A202000 form, changing its name and data items to reflect the new calculation method [5][6]. - New items have been added to the form, such as "Total Institution Allocation" and "Actual Tax Payable," to accommodate the changes in calculation methods [6]. Case Study of A Company - A Company, registered in Beijing, has branches in Shandong, Shaanxi, and Tianjin, with specific profit figures and tax calculations for each quarter of 2025 [8]. - The allocation ratios for the branches were initially set at 10%, 40%, and 50% for the first quarter, but were later corrected to 30% and 60% for the second quarter [8][10]. - The actual profit amounts for each quarter were reported as follows: Q1: 4 million, Q2: 7 million, Q3: 13 million, Q4: 12 million [8]. Tax Calculation Details - The tax amounts and allocation for each quarter were detailed, showing how the new method impacts the tax payable and the allocation among branches [10][11][12][13]. - For instance, in Q2, the corrected allocation resulted in different tax payable amounts compared to the original calculation method [14]. Implications of the New Method - The new calculation method allows for a full allocation approach, recalculating the tax distribution for the entire year if there were inaccuracies in previous calculations or if branches were closed [14]. - The case study illustrates that the new method can lead to different tax payable amounts for branches, depending on the accuracy of prior calculations and branch status [14].