中美一场暗战打响了

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that major global economies are taking steps to curb the spread of US dollar-backed stablecoins, with Europe and China actively developing their own digital currencies to enhance financial sovereignty and reduce reliance on the dollar [2][3][6]. - A consortium of nine major European banks has announced plans to launch a euro-backed stablecoin to create an alternative to the US-dominated stablecoin market, aiming for strategic autonomy in payment systems [2][3]. - The European Central Bank has expressed concerns that widespread use of dollar stablecoins in the Eurozone could undermine its control over monetary policy, potentially leading to a situation similar to that of emerging economies heavily reliant on the dollar [3][4]. Group 2 - China has launched the Digital Renminbi International Operation Center in Shanghai, along with cross-border digital payment and blockchain service platforms, marking a proactive move in the global digital finance landscape [6][7]. - The internationalization of the Renminbi has been primarily driven by trade and cooperation along the Belt and Road Initiative, but progress has been slow due to traditional settlement system inertia and capital controls [7][8]. - The dominance of dollar stablecoins in the digital finance space highlights the competitive nature of financial rules, with China's absence potentially leading to a loss of influence in setting these rules [8][11]. Group 3 - The article discusses the historical context of the dollar's dominance, which was established through institutional design and international inertia post-World War II, particularly through the Bretton Woods system and the oil dollar system [10][12]. - The reliance on dollar stablecoins in the crypto space indicates that the dollar continues to play a central role even in emerging digital financial systems, posing risks for countries like China that do not participate [11][12]. - The potential systemic risks of over-reliance on the dollar are highlighted, emphasizing that currency is not just a payment tool but also a reflection of institutional and regulatory frameworks [12][13]. Group 4 - The article outlines the challenges China faces in promoting the internationalization of the Renminbi, including the need for a credible asset backing and the risks associated with private stablecoin issuance [16][17]. - The Digital Renminbi, issued by the central bank, is positioned as a sovereign digital currency that does not rely on external assets, contrasting with privately issued stablecoins [17][18]. - The Digital Renminbi can facilitate faster and cheaper cross-border payments, potentially creating a payment network independent of the SWIFT system, which would enhance financial security [18][19]. Group 5 - Trust and compliance issues are significant hurdles for the global acceptance of the Digital Renminbi, particularly regarding privacy concerns and the need for a widely accepted compliance framework [21][22]. - The integration of the Digital Renminbi into international payment systems requires technological compatibility and regulatory trust among multiple countries [23][24]. - The article emphasizes that the success of the Digital Renminbi as a reserve currency hinges on building a robust asset pool, ensuring liquidity, and establishing a transparent regulatory environment [25][26]. Group 6 - Strategic scenarios for the Digital Renminbi's breakthrough include energy trade settlements and small-scale transactions along the Belt and Road Initiative, which could reduce reliance on the dollar [27][28]. - The article concludes that while the Digital Renminbi may initially serve as a regional settlement currency, it has the potential to gain traction in international reserves over time [28].