对智能驾驶系统某公开测试的看法和建议

Core Viewpoint - The recent serious accident involving an intelligent driving system vehicle highlights the safety issues and deficiencies in current automotive intelligent driving systems, particularly in the context of L2 and L3 classifications [1][2][4]. Group 1: Issues Identified - The public testing primarily involved systems with L3 capabilities, which do not meet the reliability requirements for L3 classification, leading to confusion in the market regarding L2 and L3 definitions [1][2]. - The testing revealed that manufacturers generally lack the capability to handle long-tail scenarios, with deficiencies in both hardware and software aspects of intelligent driving systems [2][3]. - There is a significant limitation in the testing and validation of mass-produced vehicles before market launch, as manufacturers rely heavily on simulation and road testing without adequate performance testing in dangerous conditions [3][4]. Group 2: Recommendations - It is essential to standardize the understanding of autonomous driving function classifications to prevent misleading marketing and user misuse [5][6]. - The industry must accelerate the development of standards for L2 and L3 systems, ensuring that testing and evaluation methods are unified and scientifically sound [7][8]. - Regulatory bodies should clarify testing requirements and ensure comprehensive testing methods are applied, particularly in hazardous scenarios [8][9]. - The industry should adopt integrated vehicle-road-cloud systems to enhance the performance of autonomous driving systems, addressing the limitations of single-vehicle perception [9][10]. - A data platform should be established to facilitate the collection and sharing of high-quality scenario data, which is crucial for improving the training and testing of intelligent driving systems [10][11]. - Manufacturers should conduct more extensive testing under extreme conditions to ensure that safety standards are not just met but exceeded [11][12]. - Immediate rectification of hidden door handle designs is recommended to enhance safety, regardless of pending regulatory changes [12].