欧盟拟强制中企“技术转让” 全球贸易摩擦不断

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating trade tensions between the EU and China, particularly focusing on the EU's potential new policies requiring Chinese companies to transfer technology to local firms in exchange for investment opportunities in Europe [4][5][7]. Group 1: EU's Trade Policy Changes - The EU is considering a significant shift in its trade policy towards Chinese investments, which may include mandatory technology and intellectual property transfers [4][5]. - This move is seen as a response to protect European industries, especially the automotive sector, and aims to ensure that Chinese investments create jobs and facilitate technology sharing in Europe [4][7]. Group 2: Geopolitical Context - The discussion on technology transfer is part of a broader trend of the EU adopting a tougher stance on China, as evidenced by recent proposals to impose tariffs on steel imports and the Dutch government's takeover of a Chinese-controlled semiconductor manufacturer [8][10]. - European officials are increasingly concerned about supply chain security amid geopolitical risks, particularly in light of China's new export control regulations affecting critical materials [9][10]. Group 3: Strategic Resource Concerns - The article highlights Europe's vulnerability regarding its dependence on Chinese rare earth materials, with countries like Germany and Turkey relying on China for 91% and 93% of their imports, respectively [10][11]. - The inclusion of lithium battery materials and production equipment in China's export controls signifies the strategic importance of the lithium battery industry, elevating it to a level comparable to that of rare earths [11]. Group 4: Global Market Implications - The ongoing trade tensions are creating uncertainty in global markets, with potential implications for supply chain restructuring and investor sentiment [12][13]. - The upcoming APEC summit may provide insights into whether these trade frictions are merely short-term negotiation tactics or indicative of a longer-term structural shift in global trade dynamics [12][13].