“抱歉，不投教授创业了”

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges and failures faced by professor-founders in the startup ecosystem, highlighting a growing skepticism among investors towards investing in projects led by academic professionals due to their lack of commercial acumen and commitment to entrepreneurship [3][9][12]. Group 1: Challenges Faced by Professor-Founders - Many professor-founders treat their startups as side projects, leading to conflicts with their academic responsibilities and ultimately resulting in project failures [6][8]. - A significant number of professor-led startups struggle to transition from laboratory to market, with over 50% of new material companies failing during this critical phase [9]. - The failure rate of startups founded by professors in the U.S. is alarmingly high, with estimates suggesting a failure rate of 96%-97% [9]. Group 2: Investor Sentiments and Experiences - Investors express frustration over the unpredictability of professor-founders, with some vowing to avoid investing in projects led by individuals with academic backgrounds [5][11]. - The article recounts specific instances where professors abruptly decided to abandon their startups, leaving investors in difficult positions [5][6]. - Investors emphasize the importance of having a balanced team that includes marketing and management expertise to bridge the gap between technology and market needs [11][12]. Group 3: The Need for a Shift in Mindset - There is a call for a shift in the perception of professor-led startups, recognizing that while technical expertise is crucial, it must be complemented by commercial understanding and operational capabilities [11][12]. - The article suggests that not all professors should be dismissed as potential entrepreneurs, as there are successful cases where academic professionals have made significant contributions to the startup landscape [12][13]. - The need for a supportive ecosystem that helps scientists navigate the complexities of entrepreneurship is highlighted, advocating for a more nuanced approach to investing in academic-led ventures [12].