安世产品正被替代！荷兰教授疾呼：撤回命令，向中国人道歉！

Core Viewpoint - The article critiques the Dutch government's forced takeover of Nexperia, highlighting the legal and trade implications of this decision, and calls for a retraction of the order and an apology to China [1][7]. Group 1: Government Actions and Reactions - The Dutch Minister of Economic Affairs, Vincent Karremans, invoked the Goods Availability Act to seize control of Nexperia, raising concerns about the rule of law and trade relations [1]. - Following the government's actions, internal divisions within Nexperia have intensified, leading to supply chain disruptions and prompting automotive manufacturers to seek alternative suppliers [2][3]. - Karremans defended the takeover as a coincidence and not a coordinated effort with the U.S. to suppress China, claiming ongoing negotiations with Nexperia to address shareholder issues [3][7]. Group 2: Market Impact and Supply Chain Concerns - Major clients of Nexperia, including Volkswagen, BMW, and Stellantis, have reportedly found 95% of the necessary chip alternatives, indicating a rapid loss of confidence in Nexperia's supply chain stability [2]. - The export control measures imposed by China on Nexperia's products have further complicated the situation, as over 70% of Nexperia's semiconductor packaging capacity is located in China, leaving only 30% available for markets outside China [2]. Group 3: Legal and Ethical Considerations - Legal experts, including Professor Harm-Jan de Kluiver, have criticized the government's actions, emphasizing the importance of judicial processes over administrative orders in resolving corporate disputes [7]. - The call for the government to retract its order and apologize reflects a growing concern within Dutch society regarding the adherence to the rule of law and the potential for escalating supply chain crises [7].