Core Viewpoint - The recent trade talks between China and the U.S. in Kuala Lumpur highlighted the ongoing tensions and the need for both sides to build mutual trust and manage differences, with a focus on various trade issues including tariffs and fentanyl cooperation [2][5][6]. Group 1: Trade Negotiation Context - The fifth round of trade negotiations took place in Kuala Lumpur, with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng expressing hope for mutual efforts to build trust and manage differences [2]. - Key discussion topics included U.S. maritime logistics and shipbuilding industry measures, extension of the "reciprocal tariff" suspension, fentanyl tariffs and enforcement cooperation, agricultural trade, and export controls [2]. - Chinese Commerce Ministry representative Li Chenggang noted that both sides had in-depth and candid discussions, leading to a preliminary consensus [2]. Group 2: U.S. Stance and Historical Context - Li Chenggang indicated that the U.S. maintained a hardline stance throughout the negotiations, reflecting a consistent approach since the first round in Geneva [5]. - The article draws attention to the symbolic meanings of the negotiation locations, suggesting a pessimistic outlook on the negotiations [5]. - The U.S. has engaged in disruptive activities prior to the Kuala Lumpur talks, with Treasury Secretary Yellen reportedly expressing critical views towards Chinese representatives [5]. Group 3: Future Outlook and Strategic Positioning - China is positioned to counter U.S. hegemonic practices, while the U.S. has shown insincerity in negotiations, particularly regarding tariffs and fentanyl, which are seen as tools rather than genuine negotiation points [6]. - The article suggests that maintaining normal diplomatic relations and avoiding extreme opposition is crucial, with trade cooperation possible in mutually acceptable areas [6]. - The notion that U.S.-China relations cannot return to previous states is acknowledged, emphasizing the need for both sides to work towards a new, equitable relationship [6].
中美“舌战”吉隆坡，成果几何？
水皮More·2025-10-26 12:27