理想TOP2·2025-10-27 13:50Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the comparative performance of Horizon's HSD technology and Li Auto's VLA system, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of both in terms of autonomous driving capabilities and user experience [1][2]. Group 1: Performance Comparison - Horizon's HSD engineering vehicle demonstrated superior auxiliary driving capabilities compared to Li Auto's L7 VLA as of October 2025, although there is a possibility that mass production vehicles may not perform as well as engineering prototypes [1]. - During a 1.5-hour test drive around West Lake in Hangzhou, the HSD vehicle showed high levels of comfort and smoothness, with no need for manual speed adjustments, contrasting with the frequent adjustments required in the Li Auto VLA [2]. - Feedback from multiple testers indicated that the A model of Horizon's HSD performed well, while the B model was considered average, attributed to differences in chip computing power and collaboration between the two companies [2]. Group 2: Limitations and Challenges - Horizon's team acknowledged that the HSD system performs poorly in extreme weather, non-standard scenarios, and complex situations, indicating that it is not yet fully reliable for autonomous driving [3]. - The team also noted that the transition from auxiliary driving to full autonomy can sometimes lead to subpar experiences, particularly in scenarios requiring navigation adjustments [3]. - The integration of HUD and vehicle interfaces is crucial for the overall driving experience, with some design choices being counterintuitive, which could affect user satisfaction [3]. Group 3: Community Engagement - There is an invitation for deeper discussions regarding Li Auto's operational status and long-term fundamentals, emphasizing a focus on practical business insights rather than technical discussions [4].