Core Viewpoint - The company is positioned as an artificial intelligence terminal company, but its performance is still heavily reliant on vehicle sales, which raises questions about the correlation between AI development and sales performance [1][2]. Group 1: AI Development and Business Model - The company aims to achieve Level 4 autonomous driving, emphasizing that the true value of AI will be realized when users can engage in other activities during their commutes [1]. - The company is exploring the potential to generate $100 billion in revenue with a significantly reduced workforce, indicating that successful AI implementation could validate its strategic direction [2]. Group 2: Product and Technology Strategy - The company is diversifying its operations by developing operating systems, chips, and foundational models, similar to Apple's early product ecosystem, suggesting that such expansion is reasonable given its revenue scale [2]. - The company believes that investments in technology will lead to substantial cost savings, making the diversification strategy financially beneficial [2]. Group 3: Risk Factors and Organizational Capability - The company identifies three critical factors that could lead to its failure: failure to understand user needs, lack of superior products and technology, and significant organizational capability issues [3]. - These factors are interrelated, and a comprehensive assessment of all three is necessary for effective risk management and strategic planning [3].
李想聊如何看待理想被当作汽车公司估值