外包牛马傻眼！公司错发邮件曝真相：甲方付 3.3 万，到手才 2 万！被抽走的 1.3 万去哪了？

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the significant disparity between the compensation that outsourced workers receive and the fees charged to clients, revealing a troubling trend of high profit margins for outsourcing companies at the expense of workers [3][4][8]. Group 1: Worker Experiences - Many outsourced workers shared their experiences, revealing shocking salary discrepancies. For instance, one worker received only 4,000 yuan per month while the client was billed 30,000 yuan annually, leading to a realization of a 25,000 yuan monthly rate that was largely unaccounted for [3]. - Another worker discovered that while the client paid 33,000 yuan, they only received 20,000 yuan, indicating a monthly loss of over 10,000 yuan [3]. - A worker from a brokerage firm reported that the company charged the client 326,000 yuan annually but only paid him 18,000 yuan after taxes, resulting in a profit of 146,000 yuan for the company [4]. Group 2: Company Profit Margins - Outsourcing companies typically charge clients 1.4 to 1.6 times the employee's salary, with rare instances reaching 2 times, which may require rebates to clients [5]. - The additional 0.4 to 0.6 times the salary covers taxes, social insurance, equipment, office space, and potential severance costs, indicating that not all of the company's profit is pure gain [5]. - In administrative outsourcing roles, a worker noted that while the client paid 10,000 yuan monthly, the worker received only 6,500 yuan, with the company earning approximately 1,300 yuan per month after deductions [7]. Group 3: Discrepancies in Compensation - The article indicates that the overall profit margin for outsourcing companies is often over one-third, with technical roles in IT and finance seeing margins exceeding 50% [8]. - For example, one worker reported that while the client paid over 250,000 yuan annually, they only received 45,000 yuan, resulting in an 80% profit margin for the outsourcing company [8]. - The article also notes that some companies are transparent about pricing, while others conceal the true compensation structure, leading to feelings of deception among workers [8].