数说者·2025-11-02 23:31Core Viewpoint - The article provides a comparative analysis of China Construction Bank (CCB) and Agricultural Bank of China (ABC), highlighting their total assets, revenue, and financial performance, indicating that while ABC has surpassed CCB in total assets, CCB still leads in revenue and profit metrics [2][44]. Group 1: Historical Background - CCB was established in 1954 as a state-owned bank and transitioned to a commercial bank in 1996, with its shares listed in Hong Kong and Shanghai in 2005 and 2007 respectively [3]. - ABC's origins date back to 1951, becoming a commercial bank in 1994 and listing its shares in Hong Kong and Shanghai in 2010 [5]. Group 2: Shareholding Structure - As of September 2025, CCB's largest shareholder is Central Huijin Investment with a 54.61% stake, followed by Hong Kong Central Clearing with 35.86% [4]. - ABC's major shareholders include Central Huijin Investment at 40.14% and the Ministry of Finance at 35.29% [6]. Group 3: Operational Scale - By the end of 2024, CCB had 14,750 operating institutions, while ABC had 22,877, indicating a more extensive network for ABC [7][8]. - Both banks have a nationwide presence and international branches, but ABC's network is more extensive and deeper [8]. Group 4: Financial Performance - In 2024, CCB's total assets reached 40.57 trillion yuan, while ABC's were 43.24 trillion yuan, with both expected to exceed 45 trillion yuan by September 2025 [13]. - CCB's revenue in 2024 was 750.15 billion yuan, compared to ABC's 710.55 billion yuan, indicating CCB's stronger revenue generation [13]. - CCB's net profit for 2024 was 335.58 billion yuan, while ABC's was 282.08 billion yuan, showing CCB's continued profitability advantage [13]. Group 5: Asset Quality - ABC has better asset quality metrics, with a non-performing loan (NPL) ratio of 1.30% compared to CCB's 1.34% in 2024 [14][38]. - The provision coverage ratio for ABC was 299.61%, higher than CCB's 233.60%, indicating stronger risk management [14][34]. Group 6: Cost and Efficiency - ABC's cost-to-income ratio was 34.40% in 2024, higher than CCB's 29.44%, reflecting higher operational costs [39]. - Employee costs are a significant factor, with ABC having a larger workforce and slightly higher average salaries compared to CCB [41][43]. Group 7: Business Structure - Both banks primarily rely on net interest income, but ABC's revenue is more dependent on this source, maintaining around 80% of its income from net interest [23]. - CCB has a higher proportion of loans in its total assets, with 61.72% compared to ABC's 55.45% [27]. Group 8: Long-term Trends - Over the past decade, both banks have seen growth in total assets, but ABC surpassed CCB in 2023, becoming the second-largest commercial bank in China [15][16]. - CCB has experienced more volatility in revenue growth compared to ABC, which has shown more consistent performance [17].