第一批买机器人做家务的人崩溃了

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges and limitations of autonomous home robots, suggesting that remote-controlled services may be a more practical solution for household tasks [3][7][16]. Group 1: Autonomous Robots Issues - Autonomous home robots often cause accidents, such as crashing into mirrors or kitchen cabinets, leading to frustration among users [2][9][11]. - The current technology for home robots lacks sufficient autonomy, making it difficult for them to perform basic tasks like avoiding obstacles or cooking [16][27]. - Users have reported dissatisfaction with the high prices of these robots, which do not meet their expectations for functionality [15][27]. Group 2: Remote-Controlled Solutions - Carmack suggests that selling remote-controlled home robots, like the NEO from 1X Technologies, could be more beneficial than fully autonomous models [3][4]. - The NEO robot, which can perform tasks like folding clothes and fetching water, is operated remotely via a VR headset, allowing for flexibility in task management [5][7]. - Renting the NEO at $500 per month equates to hiring a domestic helper at a rate of $2 per hour, presenting a cost-effective alternative [17]. Group 3: Consumer Concerns - Many consumers lack clear evaluation standards for emerging technologies like home robots, making them susceptible to misleading marketing [24][25]. - The trend of pre-selling home robots, with payments made for products that will not be delivered until years later, raises concerns about consumer trust and product viability [20][21][22]. - The expectation of "hands-free" convenience often leads to disappointment when the actual performance of the robots falls short [25][27].