CTA策略收益居前，分化却在加剧！谁能成为CTA“收益之王”？

Core Insights - The article discusses the performance of various private equity strategies, particularly focusing on CTA (Commodity Trading Advisor) strategies, which have shown resilience in the current market environment compared to traditional equity strategies [2][3]. Performance Overview - As of October 2025, the A-share market indices exhibited mixed performance, with subjective long-only private equity products showing an average return of -1.33% over the past month, while quantitative long products achieved an average return of 0.94% [2]. - In contrast, subjective CTA and quantitative CTA products reported average returns of 2.84% and 1.77% respectively over the same period, highlighting their strong performance within the private equity secondary strategies [2]. Private Equity Strategy Breakdown - The article provides a detailed breakdown of various private equity strategies, including: - Subjective Long: 2200 products, total scale of approximately 184.25 billion CNY, with a 1-month return of -1.33% and a 6-month return of 31.01% [3]. - Quantitative Long: 400 products, total scale of approximately 20.65 billion CNY, with a 1-month return of 1.77% and a 6-month return of 10.74% [3]. - Subjective CTA: 185 products, total scale of approximately 1.08 billion CNY, with a 1-month return of 2.84% and a 6-month return of 14.92% [3]. - Other strategies such as macro strategies, FOF, and arbitrage strategies also showed varying performance metrics [3]. Top Performing Private Equity Firms - The article identifies top-performing private equity firms based on their CTA product performance: - For firms with assets over 2 billion CNY, 洛书投资 (Luoshu Investment) ranked first with a 6-month return of ***% [4][5]. - In the 5-20 billion CNY category, 华澄私募 (Huacheng Private Equity) led with a 6-month return of ***% [6][7]. - For firms with assets under 5 billion CNY, 系综（上海）私募 (Xizong Shanghai Private Equity) topped the list with a 6-month return of ***% [8][9]. Investment Strategy Insights - The article emphasizes the importance of understanding the differences in strategy logic and risk control among various private equity managers, which can lead to significant performance disparities [4][5]. - It highlights that while CTA strategies theoretically offer superior performance, actual results can vary widely based on the management approach and execution [4].