AI能帮我变成炒币大聪明吗？我们做了个低配版Alpha Arena，让6个模型上场PK炒币｜Jinqiu Scan

Core Insights - The article discusses an AI trading competition called Alpha Arena, where various AI models participated in cryptocurrency trading, with Alibaba's Qwen achieving a return rate exceeding 20% to win the competition [3][28]. - The experiment aimed to evaluate the performance of free AI models in trading, using simple strategies that are understandable to the average user [4][28]. Group 1: AI Models and Performance - Six AI models participated in the trading competition: ChatGPT, Claude, Qwen, DeepSeek, Gemini, and Grok [6][12]. - The results showed that all models except DeepSeek and Qwen incurred losses, with ChatGPT performing the worst, ending with a -2.55% return [8][9]. - Qwen and DeepSeek did not execute any trades, maintaining their initial capital of 10,000 USDT, while other models experienced varying degrees of losses [25][28]. Group 2: Trading Strategies - ChatGPT's strategy focused on market trends and technical indicators but failed to execute effectively, leading to significant losses [13][14]. - Claude employed a more cautious approach, using MACD and volume indicators, resulting in a smaller loss compared to others [15][16]. - DeepSeek's strategy involved trend tracking and momentum breakout but ultimately led to no trades due to a lack of clear signals [17][18]. - Gemini's strategy emphasized following market trends and key support/resistance levels, resulting in minimal losses [19][20]. - Grok's approach was based on moving averages, but it also struggled with execution, leading to a loss [21][22]. - Qwen's strategy was based on long-term trend analysis but did not result in any trades during the competition [23][25]. Group 3: Insights and Future Directions - The experiment highlighted the reasoning capabilities of AI models, showcasing their ability to articulate trading logic and decision-making processes [29][30]. - However, the models lacked real-time feedback and the ability to adjust strategies dynamically, leading to overly cautious behavior [30][31]. - The article suggests that while AI can provide insights, it does not replace the need for human judgment in trading [31]. - Future experiments will involve more complex models and signals to assess whether paid AI models can perform better in trading scenarios [32][33].