达利欧：美联储结束QT=在泡沫中刺激经济，美国“大债务周期”已进入最危险阶段！

Core Viewpoint - Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns that the Federal Reserve's decision to end quantitative tightening (QT) may be adding fuel to an already inflated market, creating a larger bubble rather than stimulating a depressed economy [1][8]. Group 1: Current Economic Environment - The current environment of the Federal Reserve's quantitative easing (QE) is characterized by high asset valuations and a relatively strong economy, contrasting with historical instances where QE was deployed during economic downturns [8]. - The S&P 500 earnings yield is at 4.4%, while the nominal yield on 10-year U.S. Treasuries is approximately 4%, leading to a real yield of about 1.8% [8]. - The average real GDP growth rate over the past year is around 2%, with an unemployment rate of only 4.3% [8]. Group 2: Debt Cycle and Risks - Dalio emphasizes that the U.S. is in a dangerous phase of the "big debt cycle," where the supply of U.S. Treasuries exceeds demand, prompting the Fed to print money to purchase bonds [2]. - The current fiscal policy is highly stimulative, with significant government debt and deficits being financed through large-scale bond issuance, effectively monetizing government debt [10][11]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Asset Performance - In a liquidity-rich environment, long-duration assets (such as technology and AI stocks) and inflation-hedging assets (like gold) are expected to benefit, but this "liquidity bubble" will eventually face risks from accumulated challenges and tightening policies [3][15]. - The implementation of QE typically creates liquidity and lowers real interest rates, which can inflate asset prices and widen the wealth gap between asset holders and non-holders [5]. Group 4: Future Outlook - Dalio warns of a potential "liquidity melt-up" similar to the pre-burst of the 1999 internet bubble or the QE periods of 2010-2011, driven by the current policy mix of fiscal deficit expansion, monetary easing, deregulation, and AI growth [13][14]. - While such policies may create short-term asset booms, they also lead to faster bubble inflation, more challenging inflation control, and deeper risk accumulation, with significant costs when policies are reversed [15].