电梯广告应尊重消费者

Core Viewpoint - The prevalence of simplistic advertising reflects a laziness in corporate marketing, focusing on exposure and click rates while neglecting the aesthetic value of ads, leading to a loss of communication value and potential brand risks [1][3]. Group 1: Public Sentiment and Advertising Impact - A recent incident involving a student from Shanghai University who disabled over 100 elevator ads highlights public dissatisfaction with intrusive advertising in shared spaces, indicating a deep-seated resentment towards the commercialization of public areas [2][5]. - The shift in public perception towards elevator ads has been attributed to the repetitive and invasive nature of these advertisements, which often lack creativity and lead to negative emotional associations with brands [3][5]. Group 2: Effective Advertising Strategies - Good advertising should be seen as a gift of content to the audience rather than an imposition, reflecting a brand's respect for consumers and their intelligence [4]. - Classic advertisements, such as Apple's 1984 Super Bowl ad, exemplify how effective marketing can engage audiences through creativity and meaningful content rather than repetitive messaging [4]. Group 3: Economic Implications and Industry Trends - The competition for consumer attention in the elevator advertising space has significant economic implications, with leading companies like Focus Media demonstrating substantial cash flow capabilities comparable to major brands like Kweichow Moutai [4]. - The recent actions of the Shanghai student serve as a catalyst for brands and advertisers to reconsider their strategies, questioning whether aggressive advertising methods are sustainable for long-term consumer trust and brand integrity [5].