李斌的苦，雷军还要再吃一遍？

Group 1 - The article discusses the recent challenges faced by Xiaomi and its founder Lei Jun, drawing parallels with NIO's CEO Li Bin, highlighting the shifting dynamics in the Chinese electric vehicle (EV) industry [2][3] - The narrative emphasizes the dual nature of "traffic" in the EV sector, where it can both elevate and harm reputations, as seen in the contrasting experiences of Li Bin and Lei Jun [4][5] - Xiaomi's initial success in pre-orders for its SU7 and YU7 models is overshadowed by safety incidents, leading to a rapid decline in public perception and trust [6][15] Group 2 - The article contrasts the testing approaches of Li Bin and Lei Jun, noting that Li Bin's hands-on, transparent methods have garnered public trust, while Lei Jun's marketing-driven approach has led to skepticism [7][10] - The narrative points out that while both CEOs engage in showcasing their products, the public's reaction varies significantly based on their perceived authenticity and the outcomes of their demonstrations [11][12] Group 3 - The article highlights a shift in consumer priorities within the EV market, with safety now taking precedence over smart features, posing a significant challenge for Xiaomi [14][15] - It notes that Xiaomi's vehicles are facing declining resale values, indicating concerns about their long-term reliability and market perception [15][16] Group 4 - The piece discusses the broader implications for the EV industry, suggesting that the focus is shifting from marketing and traffic to safety and compliance, driven by regulatory changes [16][17] - It concludes that both Lei Jun and Xiaomi must navigate these challenges by prioritizing safety and rebuilding consumer trust, similar to the journey taken by NIO [18][19]