USC(SH:688403) 凤凰网财经·2025-11-27 14:26Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the removal of the影石 brand storefront at Hunan Photography City highlights escalating competition and potential anti-competitive practices in the drone and camera market, particularly between影石 and大疆 [1][4][5]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On November 19, unidentified individuals forcibly removed the影石 brand signage from a store operated by a dealer who had invested nearly 1 million yuan in renovations [1][4]. - The property management had previously informed the dealer of an unknown "exclusive agreement" that prohibited the entry of competing brands, specifically naming影石 andInsta360 as direct competitors to大疆 [1][4]. Group 2: Legal and Market Implications - Legal experts suggest that the exclusive agreement may violate anti-monopoly laws, categorizing it as an invalid anti-competitive agreement [4]. - The incident is part of a broader competitive landscape, with影石's chairman previously commenting on大疆's monopolistic tendencies in the consumer electronics sector [5][6]. Group 3: Market Dynamics - A report from久谦咨询 indicated that大疆 captured 43% of the global market share in the panoramic camera segment within three months of launching its first product, intensifying competition with影石 [5]. - The competitive tension is evident as both online and offline confrontations escalate, reflecting the fierce rivalry in the market [6].