DeepSeek再破谷歌OpenAI垄断：开源IMO数学金牌大模型

Core Insights - DeepSeek has released a new mathematical model, DeepSeekMath-V2, focusing on self-verifiable mathematical reasoning [1][7] - The model has achieved gold medal-level scores in IMO 2025 and CMO 2024, and scored 118/120 in Putnam 2024, surpassing the highest human score of 90 [2][43] - DeepSeekMath-V2 is the first open-source IMO gold medal model, raising competitive pressure on companies like Google and OpenAI [4][5] Model Performance - DeepSeekMath-V2 outperforms GPT-5-Thinking-High and Gemini 2.5-Pro across all CNML problem categories, including algebra, geometry, number theory, combinatorics, and inequalities [2][34] - The model's architecture includes 685 billion parameters, emphasizing strong proof verification capabilities [7] Training Methodology - The training process involves an iterative reinforcement learning loop that alternates between optimizing the proof verifier and the proof generator [9] - A large dataset of 17,500 proof-required math problems was collected from AoPS competitions to train the proof verifier [12] - The verifier is trained to identify issues in proofs and assign scores based on three levels of correctness [10] Meta-Verification Mechanism - A meta-verification mechanism was introduced to enhance the verifier's accuracy by assessing the validity of the identified issues [14] - The meta-verifier is trained using a dataset created from expert evaluations of the verifier's output [15] Proof Generation - The trained verifier serves as a reward model for the proof generator, which learns to self-review and correct its outputs [23] - The reward structure encourages accurate self-assessment and correction of errors in generated proofs [27] Automation and Efficiency - The collaboration between the verifier and generator leads to a fully automated data labeling process, replacing time-consuming manual annotations [29][35] - The automated process ensures high consistency with expert evaluations, significantly improving efficiency [35] Experimental Results - The model's average quality score for proof analysis improved from 0.85 to 0.96, demonstrating the effectiveness of the meta-verification mechanism [21] - The model's ability to generate correct proofs was validated through rigorous testing, showing superior performance across various mathematical problem categories [34][39]