澳洲禁止未成年人上社媒，我们要抄作业吗？

Core Viewpoint - Australia has implemented a ban on social media usage for minors under 16, effective from December 10, with non-compliant companies facing fines up to 50 million AUD (approximately 232 million RMB) [5][6]. Group 1: Policy Implementation - The ban aims to protect children from harmful content, as research indicates that 96% of children aged 10 to 15 use social media, with 70% having encountered harmful material [9][10]. - Other countries, including Malaysia, New Zealand, Germany, and Denmark, are considering similar bans, indicating a potential global trend [7][8]. Group 2: Educational Context - In conjunction with the social media ban, Singapore has announced a ban on mobile phone usage in schools starting January 2026, reflecting a broader movement to limit minors' access to technology [17]. - As of the end of 2024, 79 educational systems worldwide will have legal or policy restrictions on student mobile phone use, including countries like France, China, Brazil, and Russia [17]. Group 3: Domestic Reactions - The article notes that the domestic audience has largely supported the Australian ban, viewing it as a necessary measure for child protection [8][9]. - China's own restrictions on mobile phone usage in schools began in 2021, with policies aimed at limiting students' access to personal devices [18]. Group 4: Contradictions in Policy - There is a contradiction in the approach to technology, where schools ban phones but simultaneously rely on electronic devices for communication and management, creating a paradoxical situation for parents [25]. - The article highlights the irony of schools enforcing strict bans on technology while still utilizing it for educational purposes, leading to a cycle of electronic dependency [25][26]. Group 5: Broader Implications - The discussion raises questions about whether these measures are genuinely for the benefit of children or merely focused on academic performance, suggesting a need for a more nuanced approach to technology use in education [26][28]. - The article critiques the simplistic logic behind bans, arguing that they do not address the underlying issues of digital literacy and the quality of information available to minors [32].