美乌首次开会讨论“战后重建”，美欧争夺“万亿大蛋糕”，华尔街想在乌最大核电站旁建数据中心

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the initiation of discussions regarding Ukraine's post-war reconstruction plan, highlighting the growing divergence between the U.S. and Europe on how to manage frozen Russian assets and the overall reconstruction strategy [1][4][8]. Group 1: U.S. Proposal - The U.S. proposes to utilize approximately $200 billion of frozen Russian assets to support American-led projects, including the construction of large data centers near the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, with the potential to expand the funding pool to $800 billion under Wall Street's management [1][4][8]. - The U.S. vision includes a "business for peace" approach, allowing Wall Street executives and private equity firms to manage the funds, which U.S. officials believe will prevent rapid depletion of resources compared to European plans [8][9]. Group 2: European Response - The European Union prefers to use the frozen assets directly to support the Ukrainian government financially and for purchasing defense weapons, opposing any cooperation with Russia on energy, which they equate to a "Yalta Conference" for economic interests [1][4][9]. - European leaders, including German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, express skepticism towards the U.S. proposals, emphasizing the need to maintain economic isolation of Russia [4][9]. Group 3: Diplomatic Context - The discussions occur amid intense diplomatic negotiations involving the U.S., Europe, Ukraine, and Russia, with a focus on a revised peace proposal that has been streamlined to 20 key points [7]. - The atmosphere at the negotiation table remains tense, with reports of strong language used by U.S. officials during discussions with European leaders [7]. Group 4: Investment Opportunities - BlackRock has previously collaborated with the Ukrainian government to establish a reconstruction bank aimed at attracting private investment, which could potentially draw in hundreds of billions of dollars for reconstruction projects [6].