特朗普金卡正式开售！让移民“氪金”能让美国再次伟大起来么？

Core Viewpoint - The Trump Gold Card visa program is positioned as a significant immigration reform initiative aimed at attracting and retaining top talent in the U.S., while also generating quick revenue for the government [3][5]. Summary by Sections Program Overview - The Gold Card program replaces the 35-year-old EB-5 investment visa, emphasizing "efficient residency acquisition" without the requirement to create jobs, allowing high-net-worth individuals to obtain residency by simply paying a fee [5][10]. - The program includes two categories: personal and corporate, with the Gold Card priced at $1 million for individuals, granting permanent residency, and the Platinum Card at $5 million, offering tax benefits for overseas income [8][10]. Financial Implications - The program aims to alleviate the U.S. government's fiscal challenges by generating significant revenue, with projections suggesting it could bring in "hundreds of billions" to "trillions" of dollars to address national debt and support economic growth initiatives [12][14]. - The initial pricing of the Gold Card was adjusted from a uniform $5 million to cater to different market segments, thus lowering the entry barrier and expanding the potential applicant pool [10]. Immigration System Restructuring - The initiative reflects a shift from a skills-based to a capital-driven immigration system, targeting high-net-worth individuals while tightening traditional immigration pathways [14][19]. - The Trump administration's approach is designed to attract wealthy immigrants who can contribute to the economy without competing for local jobs, aligning with the administration's broader goals [12][14]. Market Reception and Challenges - The Gold Card program has seen a surge in interest, particularly from Asian markets, with expectations of significant capital inflow in the short term due to the expedited approval process compared to traditional immigration routes [18][19]. - However, long-term sustainability is questioned due to potential legal challenges, market demand limitations, and policy stability concerns, which could hinder the program's effectiveness and appeal [19][21][22].