审时度势朱颜花

Group 1 - The article discusses the evaluation of pivot points when RSR (strength) is high but RUN (smoothness) is low, indicating a higher risk in the current market conditions [1] - It emphasizes that RUN is more suitable for assessing the initial climbing phase, and a low RUN suggests poor trend quality and increased risk [1] - The article provides examples of stocks, such as TBEA, which have shown significant prior gains but are currently experiencing a pullback, highlighting the importance of assessing the stability of these stocks [1] Group 2 - The article compares three sets of pivot points, concluding that the first set is the most promising and safest, while the third set, despite showing some growth, is less certain [2] - It analyzes two typical stocks from the battery sector, noting that the stock with a higher RUN (Molybdenum) demonstrated greater potential compared to another stock (Tianqi Materials) with a declining RUN [3] - The essence of the analysis is to evaluate pullbacks in continuous trends using the maximum TR over a 20-day period, where more breaches indicate instability and lower potential [4] Group 3 - The article mentions that certain stocks in the optical connection sector are active but have low and declining RUN, suggesting that while they can be traded, they carry higher risks [4][6] - It highlights the importance of comparing RUN levels across different sectors to identify which stocks to choose, with a focus on those with higher RUN values [6] - The article concludes that stocks with a strong base are less favorable than those in the initial phase of a major upward trend, as profit-taking can lead to frequent TR breaches and increased risk [7]