基本面没变、股价却崩了，你该抄底还是逃跑？

Group 1 - The article discusses the reliability of market movements and the concept of "Mr. Market," suggesting that stock prices often reflect future changes in fundamentals rather than current conditions [3][4][6] - It highlights examples from various industries, such as consumer goods and renewable energy, where stock prices peaked before revenue growth did, indicating a potential predictive nature of stock prices [4][5] - The article argues against the belief that stock prices can predict fundamental changes, emphasizing that market movements are often a result of a small percentage of informed investors influencing prices while the majority react to these changes [18][30] Group 2 - The article critiques the notion that stock prices foresee fundamental changes, stating that this belief is often a narrative bias and that stock prices and fundamentals generally move in sync [28] - It explains that when fundamentals do not change, stock prices exhibit random fluctuations, and only a small fraction of investors (10%) can accurately price in changes, leading to misinterpretations by the larger market [29][30] - The conclusion emphasizes that while the market is effective, it does not allow for easy exploitation of its efficiency, as most investors must rely on their limited understanding to make decisions [32]