国企差旅黄金时代，结束了

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the tightening of travel policies within state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in China, highlighting the shift from luxury to more modest accommodations and the impact on the business travel market [26][52]. Group 1: Changes in Travel Policies - SOEs are increasingly restricting travel budgets and expenditures in response to government mandates for cost-cutting and compliance [28][36]. - The emphasis on compliance has led to a defensive administrative approach, where employees avoid any appearance of extravagance, even when choosing budget-friendly options [41][46]. - The internal audit processes have become more stringent, with a focus on the names of hotels rather than their actual pricing or service levels [12][40]. Group 2: Impact on Hotel Choices - High-end international hotel brands like Hilton and Marriott are now viewed as risky choices for SOE employees due to their association with luxury [54][57]. - There is a noticeable shift towards domestic mid-range hotel brands that are perceived as safer and more compliant with current regulations [58][59]. - The demand for local hotel brands such as Atour and Vienna is increasing as they align with the low-profile and practical approach required by SOEs [58][59]. Group 3: Business Travel Management - The priorities of travel management companies (TMCs) are evolving, with a greater focus on safety and compliance rather than just cost reduction [61][63]. - SOEs now require TMCs to provide systems that can automatically filter out non-compliant options and flag sensitive destinations [64]. - The era of business travel characterized by leisure and luxury is ending, giving way to a more pragmatic and utilitarian approach to travel [65][67].