集思录·2025-12-22 13:44Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the valuation challenges faced by various industries in the A-share market, highlighting that despite global competitiveness, many sectors are undervalued due to market dynamics and investor behavior [1][10]. Group 1: Industry Valuations - Home Appliances: Midea (13x), Haier (12.3x), Hisense (12.73x) [1] - Engineering Machinery: Sany (23.6x), XCMG (20x), Zoomlion (17x) [2] - Forklifts: Hangcha (16x), Heli (14x) [2] - Tires: Zhongce (12x), Sailun (16x), Senqilin (14x) [2] - Heavy Trucks: China National Heavy Duty Truck (12x) [2] Group 2: Market Dynamics - The industries mentioned are characterized by low-frequency consumption and strong cyclicality, leading to fluctuating performance and valuations based on government subsidies and market conditions [1][2]. - The article suggests that a P/E ratio around 15x is reasonable for stable growth industries, providing a risk premium over ten-year government bonds [1][2]. Group 3: Investment Behavior - Institutional investors hold significant pricing power in these markets, making it challenging for individual investors to influence valuations [1][2]. - The article emphasizes that high expectations can lead to investment disasters, and that long-term returns may be better for established companies despite their low valuations [3][10]. Group 4: Valuation as an Incentive Mechanism - Valuation is described as an incentive mechanism that reflects market competition and societal evolution, where higher valuations encourage innovation and investment in growth sectors like technology [4][5][6]. - Conversely, traditional industries with stable earnings often receive lower valuations due to a lack of societal encouragement for new investments [7][10]. Group 5: Global Comparisons - The article notes that mature manufacturing companies globally, such as Toyota and Caterpillar, also exhibit low valuation multiples, indicating a broader trend beyond the A-share market [14][15][16].