市场监管总局回应“南极磷虾油”问题

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the regulatory response to the "Antarctic krill oil" issue, emphasizing the need for stricter supervision of food production practices and accountability among companies involved in the production and distribution of such products [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The State Administration for Market Regulation plans to strengthen supervision over food entrusted production, particularly in light of the Antarctic krill oil incident, which revealed non-compliance in production practices [1]. - A new "Food Entrusted Production Supervision Management Measures" will be released, detailing the responsibilities of both parties involved in food production and enhancing regulatory requirements [1]. - Local market regulatory authorities will be guided to intensify oversight of similar entrusted production practices, including those related to well-known brands [1]. Group 2: Incident Details - A product labeled as "Beijing Tongrentang 99% high-purity Antarctic krill oil" was found to have a phospholipid content of 0%, despite claims of high quality and purity [2]. - Beijing Tongrentang Group issued an apology and initiated a strict management action, including a comprehensive investigation into the involved parties and the immediate removal of the problematic product from shelves [2]. - The Chengdu Market Supervision Administration has formed a joint investigation team to look into the matter and has opened a case against the involved company, ensuring consumer rights are protected [2].