华盛顿邮报：ChatGPT被高估了，以下是一些替代选择

Core Viewpoint - The article argues that there is no single best AI chatbot, and users should select different tools for different tasks based on their performance in practical applications [4][5]. Group 1: AI Chatbot Performance - ChatGPT, despite its popularity, has never ranked above second in various tests against other chatbots [6]. - Anthropic's Claude chatbot outperformed ChatGPT in writing tasks, demonstrating better emotional expression and consideration [7]. - Google's AI mode is preferred for research and quick answers due to its ability to conduct multiple searches and provide timely information [7]. Group 2: Limitations of AI Tools - Many chatbots struggle with basic knowledge questions, indicating their reliance on text and limitations in image recognition [10][11]. - AI tools often provide seemingly immediate answers but lack the ability to express uncertainty, leading to incorrect responses [11]. - The performance of AI chatbots in practical scenarios often falls short of human standards, with most scoring between 50% and 65% in tests [10]. Group 3: Recommendations for Effective Use - Users are encouraged to provide detailed information when querying chatbots to improve the quality of responses [12]. - Custom instructions can be added to chatbots to request clarification when prompts are vague, enhancing interaction quality [12]. - Continuous evaluation and testing of AI tools are necessary to adapt to their evolving capabilities and limitations [13].