《纽约时报》社论：特朗普对委内瑞拉的攻击是非法的，也是不明智的

Core Viewpoint - The article argues that President Trump's military actions against Venezuela are illegal and unwise, drawing parallels to past U.S. interventions that have led to instability rather than resolution [1][4][5]. Summary by Sections Military Deployment and Actions - Trump has deployed a significant military presence in the Caribbean, including an aircraft carrier, at least seven other ships, dozens of aircraft, and 15,000 troops, to threaten Venezuela [1]. - The recent arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro is described as a major escalation in Trump's military actions [2]. Historical Context and Lessons - The article highlights that U.S. attempts to overthrow even the most despised regimes often worsen the situation, citing failures in Afghanistan, Libya, and Iraq [2][4]. - It emphasizes that past U.S. interventions in Latin America have led to chaos in countries like Chile, Cuba, Guatemala, and Nicaragua [2]. Legal and Constitutional Issues - Trump's actions lack constitutional justification, as he has not sought Congressional approval, which is required for military action [3][5]. - The article critiques the rationale of combating "drug terrorists," arguing that Venezuela is not a major producer of drugs contributing to the U.S. opioid crisis [3]. International Law Violations - The military actions against Venezuelan vessels are described as violations of international law, particularly regarding extrajudicial killings [6]. - The article notes that the U.S. has acted without international legitimacy or legal authorization, potentially emboldening authoritarian regimes elsewhere [4][6]. Potential Consequences - The article warns that the situation in Venezuela could worsen, with increased violence from groups like the ELN and potential disruptions to global energy and food markets [7][8]. - It expresses concern that Trump's aggressive stance may lead to greater suffering for the Venezuelan people and long-term damage to U.S. interests globally [8].