英国卫报：“赤裸裸的帝国主义”：特朗普干预委内瑞拉标志着美国重蹈覆辙

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the historical context and implications of the recent U.S. military intervention in Venezuela, highlighting it as a continuation of a long-standing pattern of American imperialism in Latin America, marking a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy under the Trump administration [1][2][5]. Historical Context - The U.S. has a history of intervening in Latin America, often through military means, to assert its dominance, with the most recent action being the direct military attack on Venezuela, which is unprecedented in South America [1][2][5]. - The article draws parallels between the current situation and past interventions, notably the 1989 invasion of Panama to capture Manuel Noriega, emphasizing the consistency of U.S. actions in the region [2][5]. Policy Shift - The Trump administration's new national security strategy explicitly calls for an expansion of U.S. military presence in Latin America, reflecting a return to the Monroe Doctrine's principles, which advocate for U.S. influence in the region [5][6]. - Scholars note that the recent military action signifies a major change in U.S. diplomatic and defense policy, with implications for future interventions [5][6]. Examples of Past Interventions - The article lists several historical interventions by the U.S. in Latin America, including: - The 1847 invasion of Mexico, resulting in the loss of 55% of Mexican territory [9]. - The U.S. control over Cuba following the Spanish-American War and subsequent occupations [12]. - The 1915 invasion of Haiti, where the U.S. controlled key governmental functions until 1934 [15]. - The 1989 invasion of Panama, which resulted in significant civilian casualties and political upheaval [20]. Consequences of Interventions - Historical interventions have rarely led to lasting peace or stability, often resulting in power struggles and long-term governance issues in the affected countries [21][22]. - The article suggests that the pattern of U.S. intervention tends to create more complex political landscapes rather than resolving conflicts [21][22].